general

Shiba Inu News Today: Shiba Inu Trades Sideways Amid Market’s Wait for Breakout

The post Shiba Inu News Today: Shiba Inu Trades Sideways Amid Market’s Wait for Breakout appeared com. Shiba Inu is trading at a tight range following a protracted bear market, as an indicator of the market being undecided and patiently awaiting fresh impetus in the meme-coin market. Shiba Inu (SHIB) is trading in a silent period of lateral movement after a long bear market that lasted almost a year. Market information shows that there is a steady trading volume of approximately $191 million per day, which indicates balanced forces between profit takers and short-term buyers. This pullback period highlights a continuous waiting period to revitalized energy or wider market conditions to propel SHIB out of its current small price range. The recent price of the token is around 0. 0000000983, with a drop in price of around 2. 5 percent per day, and a market value of approximately 5. 79 billion dollars. The intraday charts depict small price declines accompanied by small recoveries at the level of $0. 0000098. These damp vibrations indicate the divided excitement among the traders as the lack of any strong triggers keeps SHIB stagnating in the consolidation phase. Market Patterns Show Lingering Bear Impact The recent design of Shiba Inu resembles a protracted correctional pattern, which is characterized by a decrease in volatility and a decline in trading range. The coin has had rapid appreciation phases in the past two years, but they have been succeeded by periods of long-lasting correction, which has seen volume and price erosion. Source -X This boom and bust cycle is characteristic of the broader meme-coin market as speculation enthusiasm dies. Within a month, SHIB surged greatly in a hype-driven and retail-demand-fueled early rally. But the momentum died away soon, and a six-month bear market followed. This was then followed by the three-month relief rally that raised some hope of recovery, only to fall short in breaking the well-established resistance levels.

general

Danyela Souza Egorov New York’s Plan for Math Instruction Doesn’t Add Up The state’s new Numeracy Initiative emphasizes equal outcomes over merit and rigor.

New York students’ math scores lag the national average and have remained stagnant for many years, despite massive increases in per-pupil funding. In May, the New York State Department of Education (NYSED) launched a Numeracy Initiative to address the issue. Unfortunately, its guidance will lead to even poorer math instruction. The initiative has released a series of Numeracy Briefs, which aim to instruct educators in “best practices for effective mathematics instruction.” The briefs were produced by TeachingWorks, a group led by University of Michigan professor Deborah Loewenberg Ball. The group’s goal, according to its website, is to promote “teaching to create a more just society” and to develop “equitable, skillful teaching.” The briefs quickly caused confusion and concern among educators who attended NYSED’s professional development sessions. Some noticed that the guidance from NYSED contradicted well-established math pedagogy, as well as advice from other experts in the field. They reached out to Benjamin Solomon, an associate professor in school psychology at the University of Albany, who has conducted several webinars on math instruction. He wrote a letter to NYSED commissioner Betty Rosa detailing the Numeracy Briefs’ inaccuracies and questionable practices. The letter garnered support from more than 160 teachers, parents, and researchers, all of whom signed a petition calling for the briefs to be withdrawn. Solomon’s letter states that the briefs cite only two meta-analyses to support their recommendations and rely mostly on books and articles-all while ignoring the substantial body of research that constitutes the science of math. As Solomon noted, “the briefs are mostly [TeachingWorks’] opinion.” Asked to comment on Solomon’s letter, NYSED responded by stating, “Attempts to distort or politicize this work will not deter NYSED’s commitment to advancing high-quality, equitable mathematics instruction for every student in New York State.” Open Book New York has no records showing how much NYSED paid TeachingWorks to produce the briefs. NYSED should disclose the amount so the public can understand how much was spent to develop guidance that leaves educators and students so confused. State legislators should also hold hearings to investigate how the briefs’ recommendations diverge from established math science.